the link for the article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/17/health/policy/obama-administration-says-birth-control-mandate-applies-to-religious-groups-that-insure-themselves.html
yes, the link says:obama-administration-says-birth-control-mandate-applies-to-religious-groups-that-insure-themselves
but the actual headline says:
U.S. Clarifies Policy on Birth Control for Religious Groups
the first paragraph says:
— The Obama administration took another step on Friday to enforce a federal mandate for health insurance coverage of contraceptives, announcing how the new requirement would apply to the many Roman Catholic hospitals, universities and social service agencies that insure themselves.
Sounds like they are extending the mandate further, not "clarifying" it...
The mandates go further than that, of course, and include a comment by Ms. Fluke, who is still upset that she can't afford her birth control pill while vacationing in Spain with her millionaire boyfriend.
But where is the comment by the bishops? Hello?
What, you expect such trivia in the NYTIMES?
No comments:
Post a Comment