mainly posted for later listening.
The cult like beliefs of the left are obvious, and the left mainly points to the cult like Trumpieboy followers.
.....................
another podcast for later consideration:
mainly posted for later listening.
The cult like beliefs of the left are obvious, and the left mainly points to the cult like Trumpieboy followers.
.....................
another podcast for later consideration:
Here’s the reason why Donald Trump won by the largest margin of any President in modern history. He’s not an ideologue. He’s not a policy wonk. He’s an American badass. They tried to DQ him, jail him, kill him (twice). None of it worked. Our self-appointed “betters” in the media…
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) November 6, 2024
......
WHen I pointed out to my son that I couldn't vote for Harris because of her extreme pro abortion policies (abortion up to nine months, forcing doctors to perform abortions, something I fought when I was in medical school) he agreed, saying she talked about abortion and Gender issues but not about the economy, food prices etc. (We are both registered Democrats and minorities)
In other words, her emphsis on manipulating society to allow her social agenda, which the privacy of ordinary Americans would not tolerate, was a mistake, and her failure to address the problems that most ordinary American were worried about was probably why she lost a lot of votes.
.....
For all the talk of DEI, people forget that this is something that benefits elites, not ordinary folk. Ironically, DEI would benefit Harris, the daughter of two professors, over Vance, the son of a nurse and from a broken family who worked his way up from his bootstraps.
All the DEI policies at college level admissions works against Asians of course, while letting people ignore the real problem: Crappy public schools. School choice? might help. It says a lot that both Bill Clinton (who like Vance came from a dysfunctional family), and Clarence Thomas (raised by his grandfather) were educated in Catholic schools.
Alas, the Vatican II reforms persuaded nuns that they should do social work instead of teaching kids, so lots of nuns quit. So Catholic school enrollment went down as prices went up, but on the other hand, homeschools and small Protestant church schools helped fill in the gap for alternative education that was cheap enough for ordinary folk.
Which brings me to another possible change:
if the deplorables are changing governments, will the next change be against the Pope and his minions who like the uniparty in the US are trying to manipulate a fake consensus to change things by a very unpopular synodality scam ?
Newsweek has a long editorial by Jonathan Tobin discussing the implications of the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency.
He puts it into the context of stopping the power grab by the unelected administrative state that has been overstepping the law. Read the whole thing:
If the USA is not to sink into a civil war, the first step might be to actually allow input by it's citizens instead of special interest groups who have an agenda.
This means stopping courts (as in RvW) and the bureaucrats (in the latest EPA expansion by unelected bureaucrats) from making laws without the messy input of democratic discussion and input.
Yes, there is a need for expertise (which is why the US is a republic, like ancient Rome (which lasted 500 years) and not a democracy like Athens, where demagogues took it over by manipulating public opinion within a century).
What is interesting in the Newsweek editorial is why it was opposed by some justices in the SC and of course most of the MSM: the idea that climate change is too important to be left to the voter.
...With respect to the EPA, the Left is fully convinced that the urgency of climate change means that the Constitution and democracy can be thrown out the window.
As even Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent after a lengthy dissertation on the horrors of global warming and the theories about it leading to planetary doom, "Whatever else this court may know about, it does not have a clue about how to address climate change." She's right about that, but the Supreme Court's purpose isn't to make or approve environmental policy.
italics mine.
Hmm... this argument sounds more like Alex Jones, Glenn Beck, or other right wing conspiracy nuts who see both covid and Climate change as either hoaxes or as real problems that are being exaggerated so the New World Order can take over....
As in the Great Reset... link2.
...
A relative of ours was in a personal care facility in Pennsylvania when Covid hit and it meant our family couldn't visit her, and we were very worried since she was high risk (obesity and diabetes).
Many nursing home patients had a poor immune system due to cancer, age, obesity, diabetes, renal failure, etc. (which is why many die despite having the vaccine).
But early in the epidemic, isolation was the most important way to stop the spread. So visitors, who are much needed to keep up the morale of the elderly in these homes, were restricted.
So why did so many states push to allow post hospital covid positive patients to be readmitted?
It's complicated but it amounts to thinking that regulations make it safe, even when regulations are not followed.
The rational was that hey, the nursing homes could keep them safely isolated.
Yup. That's what the regulations and documents stated, but anyone who knows about nursing homes knew that, not only did many lack PPE early in the epidemic (blamed on Trumpieboy but actually because the administrators didn't want to spend money to stock up on these, and took their time in ordering more), but the staff didn't use them properly.
Indeed, the authorities knew that this was a problem: From March 2020:
In the initial wave of surveys during the week of March 30, CMS found that 36 percent of facilities inspected in recent days did not follow proper hand washing guidelines and 25 percent failed to demonstrate proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Both of these are longstanding infection control measures that all nursing homes are expected to follow per Federal regulation.
The background to this is that many of the staff were poorly trained and overworked.
So why insist that post hospitalization infectious covid patients be placed back into their nursing homes?
The regulation behind this is not new and the idea is to get long term patients out of expensive hospital beds into cheaper nursing home beds.
and the problem didn't start with Covid.
One of our nursing homes in Minnesota back in the late 1990s had an ongoing fight with the authorities who insisted we admit a patient with Vancomycin resistant Staph aureus, meaning that the germ was resistant to all antibiotics.
Now, this nursing home had many patients with diabetic ulcers who were there mainly because they couldn't travel during the wintertime to get daily treatment. If these wounds were infected with a resistant germ, it could lead to amputation or death.
But never mind: On paper the patient could be isolated and kept safe.
and that is the real problem: rules vs reality.
or as the scientist who cracked the facade about the Challenger disaster noted:
Regulations matter, but regulations not connected to reality are essentially CYA lies, meant to protect the bureaucrats, not the patients. So why didn't doctors or nurses working for the government point this out? Yes, it's hard to fire a government employee, but they can make your life hell until you quit.
I know: because I worked as a physician for both the state and the federal (IHS) systems and was always in trouble because I put the patient's welfare before the regulations.
But not everyone does this, which is why I suspect Dr. L managed to get her job: I suspect she was a team player. And of course, being a team player, she decided not to object to these dangerous regulations when it came to covid.
The governors could plead ignorance, because hey they are politicians, not doctors.
But what about doctors who go along with the regulations even though they knew it was nonsense? And indeed, their actions proved that they knew the practice was dangerous.
As this Newsweek article from May 2020 pointed out:
Pennsylvania Health Secretary Moved Mother Out Of Nursing Home As Coronavirus Death Toll Increased In State....
Yup. She put your relatives into danger while making sure her own mother was safe in a hotel.
Again from that May 2020 article in Newsweek:
Outbreaks in Pennsylvania long-term care facilities make up nearly 70 percent of the state's coronavirus-related deaths and 21 percent of the state's positive cases of the virus. In a Wednesday press conference, Levine announced that of the 58,698 confirmed cases statewide, 12,408 cases are among residents of long-term facilities, including nursing homes and personal care homes. Of the total 3,943 deaths in Pennsylvania, 2,705 have occurred in residents in long-term facilities....
In this article from a small town Pennsylvania newspaper in June 2020, she defends the policy:
Levine defends returning nursing home residents to facilities after coronavirus treatment: 'The virus was already there,' she says....
Pennsylvania Department of Health Secretary Rachel Levine on Monday downplayed a point that critics of the state’s coronavirus response in nursing homes and long-term-care facilities regularly make: that returning residents who had been treated in hospitals for the virus to their homes at the facilities helped speed its spread.
She said that the state followed federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines that if a resident has tested positive for COVID-19 at a facility and then required hospitalization, that when they recovered, they were returned home to their facility.
Italics mine. Has any reporter found out who in the vast Medicare bureaucracy put out that regulation?
She said the state instituted guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in early in March when the first cases were detected in Pennsylvania, including limiting outside visitors from entering long-term-care facilities. “They contracted the virus in the facility. So it doesn’t mean they were bringing it to the facility. The virus was already there,” she said Monday during her daily press briefing.
again italics mine.
This is an untrue statement, since the possibility of spreading infection goes higher with the increase in the number of people with the infection.
But it does recognize that many people with covid weren't sick enough to be placed in hospitals, so yes, they could spread it within the institutions, who did not have adequate PPE or isolation rooms or staff to handle these cases.
the smart thing would have been to designate one facility to handle these patients in proper isolation in a different facility in order to protect the other patients. In the past, this was done with TB, for example, and I am old enough to remember when Philadelphia had a TB hospital and an infectious disease hospital to isolate cases that needed care.
Putting covid positive post hospital patients in these homes should have been a viable option: but the dirty little secret is that the paperwork and regulations stopped that from becoming reality.
Hey, that would mess up the protocols of insisting they return to their usual nursing home bed.
So place the "Republican pounce" headline here.
However, others see it differently. State Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican from Franklin County, called for Levine’s resignation May 11, saying her actions were a major factor in the large number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in the state’s nursing homes. “These failings are compounded by being complicit in the virus spreading through our elder care homes, triggered by unscientific and illogical directives, forcing them to readmit COVID-19 patients,” he said in part, adding, “Let me state this clearly, this order by Secretary Levine is responsible for the deaths of approximately 2,500 of our citizens, and displays the gross incompetence of someone unfit for office. The bottom line is Secretary Levine has failed to protect our most vulnerable population.”
The failure of the CDC and regulatory bodies in the covid epidemic are legion, but hey the press just blamed Trump for the bureaucratic mindset that put following regulations as more important than fixing things.
So why is a physician who obviously put cooperation with regulations as more important than patient's lives being placed as head of the nation's public health service?
Partly because, as someone with a history of being a team player, one doubts she will do the needed firing and reforms needed to make the America public health system do their job.
But as you can see from the ecstatic headlines, the job was given to her, not for her competence (?/S) but because she used to be a man.
And to make things worse, it was nominating an outsider despite the fact that the PHS Commissioned Corps has many many well qualified minority physicians who could do the work, but I guess if you are a trans activist, it doesn't matter if you are white.
And it is politically correct to push trans rights, even if the nominee has been shown to be willing to let people die in order to be a team player.
I won't put up her photo: The right makes fun of her all the time for her appearance, but my only comment is that she needs a fashion makeover by Vice Ganda.
(headsup Instapundit, a libertarian blog, where you can find a lot of links about the modern left's censorship of free speech.)
...................
related link: Max Taibbi on media manipulation inspired by love of money and ratings.
Noam Chomsky call your office...
..........
Update WaPost reports FBI aware of danger, did nothing.
https://www.wvnews.com/news/wvnews/washington-post-fbi-report-warned-of-war-at-capitol-contradicting-claims-that-there-was-no/article_f02b0e87-e8e3-5940-b8c2-ae3f57afc3fb.html
https://www.gnews.org/749126/
The ministry’s attempt to revoke the group’s lease was launched after Steve Bannon and Benjamin Harnwell announced that they intended to use the monastery to launch an Academy for the Judeo-Christian West which would offer courses in history, philosophy, theology and politics... a revelation which sparked public protests and parliamentary questions from Left-wing parties.
“Fake news”, I said. That is my reaction when I heard from my friend for the first time that there’s a breaking news on Chinese websites said Steve Bannon was arrested.
Ten minutes later, BBC report the same news, and then CNN, FOX, and then it spread to everyone. It took them only 21 minutes to do these things from writing to editing to publishing the news after the things happened. How efficient the China’s propaganda system this time is! Does CCP involve it? I have no idea. All I know is CCP is mad with joy now. Because Mr. Bannon is one of the most threatening people to CCP. From now on, The U.S. judicial system will drag Bannon into the quagmire of litigation.
They speak of “deep-rooted systems of oppression; legacies of hate.” No elaboration required here? No specification of where Brown might stand within such a system? No nuance or complexity? Is it obvious that “hate”—as opposed to incompetence, or fear, or cruelty, or poor training, or lack of accountability, or a brutal police culture, or panic, or malfeasance—is what we observed in Minneapolis?
We are called upon to “effect change.” Change from what to what, exactly? Evidently, we’re now all charged to promote the policy agenda of the “progressive” wing of American politics. Is this what a university is supposed to be doing? I must object. This is no reasoned ethical reflection. Rather, it is indoctrination, virtue-signaling, and the transparent currying of favor with our charges.hmmm...
“Here’s the juice: urban police unions who block accountability for bad cops contribute to Democratic politicians running cities who haven’t elected Republicans in 50 years … yet somehow the cause of the problem is thrown at the feet of a President who’s only been in office 3-1/2 years?!?”So why is Trumpieboy the scapegoat?
We will also discover that the riots in these days were provoked by those who, seeing that the virus is inevitably fading and that the social alarm of the pandemic is waning, necessarily have had to provoke civil disturbances, because they would be followed by repression which, although legitimate, could be condemned as an unjustified aggression against the population.
The same thing is also happening in Europe, in perfect synchrony. It is quite clear that the use of street protests is instrumental to the purposes of those who would like to see someone elected in the upcoming presidential elections who embodies the goals of the deep state and who expresses those goals faithfully and with conviction
If . . . the President must step down ... a disgraced man and a political outcast . . . upon insufficient proofs and from partisan considerations, the office of President would be degraded, cease to be a coordinate branch of the government, and ever after subordinated to the legislative will. It would practically have revolutionized our splendid political fabric into a partisan Congressional autocracy. . . . This government Lad never faced so insidious a danger . . , control by the worst element of American politics.
..Edmund G. Ross (R Kansas).quoted in Profiles in Courage
In the sixth century, Byzantine scholar Procopius wrote that some factions of young males wore their hair long at the back and cut it short over the forehead. This non-Roman style was termed the 'Hunnic' look.
What you’re not seeing is the guy up on the overpass who had intended to jump.
Those children with normal IQ should be able to fit into society, so deinstitutionalization is good.
Of the 75 children with ASD, 55% had an intellectual disability (IQ<70 16="" 28="" average="" but="" disability="" had="" intellectual="" intelligence="" moderate="" only="" severe="" to="">IQ>85) but only 3% were of above average intelligence (IQ>115).70>
and then there is this:
In 1998, Trump invited Sean Combs, the rapper then known as Puff Daddy. But Combs scandalized Palm Beach when he was caught on a beach in the "middle of his midnight romp with a long-legged stunner," according to the Page Six account in the New York Post.
Palm Beach has a lot of rules: No whistling allowed on public streets after midnight. No "Missing Dog" — or any sign — posted on a tree. And no flag poles taller than 42 feet. In late 2006 Trump put up a giant American flag on an 80-foot pole. That led to a $1,250-a-day fine against him, drawing national headlines that Trump basked in.yes, a publicity scam. But it worked.
not only Saudi but nearly everyone else is doing this: for example, the Gulf States, Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong kong have been deporting OFW without proper papers. Even the Philippines suspects they have one million plus without proper papers.
RIYADH – A total of 253,086 people have been arrested in five weeks since the start of the ongoing crackdown against violators of residency and labor regulations in the Kingdom.
Beijing is particularly concerned about the North’s nuclear tests, since the Punggye-ri site is less than 100km (60 miles) from the border with China.
North Korean nuclear tests have caused seismic events in Chinese border towns and cities, forcing evacuations of schools and offices, sparking fears of wind-borne radiation and leading to a backlash among some Chinese against their country’s unpredictable traditional ally.
Chinese authorities have said they’ve detected no radiation risk from the tests. Kune Yull Suh, a professor of nuclear engineering at Seoul National University, warned last year that further tests could threaten to cause a volcanic eruption at Mount Paektu, which is about 100km away.
Pacing and Leading: Pacing refers to matching your subject in some way, either physically, verbally, or in terms of philosophy. Candidate Trump paced (matched) his base on immigration until he got elected. Now the base trusts that he is philosophically aligned with them. So if he finds he can’t do all the things they demand, they are likely to let him lead to whatever is practical and doable simply because they trust him on the topic.
People don’t expect a politician to be magic, or to do the impossible. But they do want politicians to “get” them and to care about them and to fight for what they want. President Trump paced his supporters by understanding their needs and fighting for them. That group is likely to trust him when he says some form of “This is the best we can do for now.”sounds about right.

The women’s march organizers blew it, and even the media realize it. “ . . .
Of perhaps more significant interest, however, is the fact that Keilar and CNN were forced to put the March for Life on the same political footing as the Women’s March on Washington.well, yes. It has been ignored because it didn't fit the narrative.
... (In The Empire Strikes Back) Darth Vader solves all the biggest bureaucratic problems that face our Navy today. In fact, we should all strive to be more like this Dark Lord of the Sith.---------------------
After reviewing constant Galactic Internet content about why his Imperial Officers were leaving service early to go be nerf herders or moisture farmers, Darth Vader made it fun to be in the Imperial Navy again.
Despite his unnatural inclinations towards the Dark Side of the Force, Darth Vader leaves us with valuable lessons on how to properly solve problems facing today's Navy.
some experts warned that Angelenos’ zeal to use less water in the backyard would ultimately make the city warmer.
“Gardens and lawns act as air conditioning for L.A., which is only getting hotter with climate change,” landscape designers Mia Lehrer, Claire Latané and Margot Jacobs wrote in a 2015 op-ed in the Los Angeles Times. “Plants and trees provide shade and transpire moisture to cool the air; gravel and artificial turf don't.
THEY ARE OPENLY MOCKING US As of July of this year we squirrels (and our fellow animal operatives) have conducted over 1,400 unclassified operations that have resulted in aggregate of more than 67 days without power, affecting over 3.6 million people.