Movies movies

Hobbit photos at TORN

------------------------------
remember this film?

I remember when the case went to court. There was a big best seller about it too.

I read the book, and it is a crap job (I remember shaking my head when he argued that 50 mgs of demerol didn't put him out so he must have been on amphtetamines. Heck, I fall asleep with a glass of wine, and 50 of demerol doesn't phase me).

What convinced me that the guy was guilty was the blood type evidence, and the third hand rumors from those who worked with him. But never mind. If they kept the evidence they could confirm the theory of others being there by DNA evidence. I mean, he was a "Green Beret" so was there no "defense" wounds? Oh yes: he had at least one wound, which could have been faked, but was there evidence he fought back, and maybe some strange DNA at the crime scene?

But now a new book suggests it was a case tried in the press, and points his fingers at the author.
Ex neighbor blasts a "reporter" who made a fortune with the book/movie tie in...was he guilty of framing an innocent man?

--------------------------------------------------

and what do you get when you cross Firefly with Shakespeare?

and don't worry girls:

Nathan Fillion has a minor part in it too...