The shocking things they wouldn't print

the uberliberal Jesuit magazine has censored an interview with a gay activist with a black husband.

Who wudda thot?

well, it's Milo of course.

 Although you grew up Catholic, you now say and do many shocking things in your public career which seem to be at odds with your childhood faith. In what sense do you still consider yourself a Catholic? 

 Plenty of saints were shocking, to say nothing of our Lord, who got in a spot of trouble for His shocking claims, as you might recall.

I am certainly no saint, but I don’t think “shocking” is a helpful way of approaching the question of Catholics in public life.

It doesn’t settle much to say that the current Pope is shocking to many Catholics, including me.

Or to note that I’m shocked by supposedly Catholic politicians who make laws in flat contradiction to the natural law, which you need no faith to grasp.

In my case, do you mean it’s shocking that a Catholic like me is loudly worried about Islam, which has waged war on Holy Mother Church for more than a millennium?

Or that I say Planned Parenthood’s abortion crusade amounts to black genocide?

Or that I’ve supported Pope Paul VI’s criticism of artificial contraception so strongly that Hillary Clinton attacked me for it in her presidential campaign?

Frankly, what’s really shocking is that a poor sinner like me has spoken out more on contraception than 99% of our bishops, who seem too preoccupied with diversity and climate change to talk about God.

Ouch.

and there is more.

Headsup TeaAtTrianon