the lab issue going around the internet is nonsense, be it about Wuhan or the Ukraine's labs.
the Russians were claiming they were worried about labs sending anthrax, Bubonic plague, or Weils disease as a form of warfare.
Well, you can get anthrax from the soil all over the world, since those spores last a long long time. But the spores are big, and to use them as a weapon, you have to grind up spores and keep them from clumping, so it can spread through the air to your lungs. This is hard to do without the proper equipment and training, but it has the advantage that it won't spread person to person and cause an epidemic.
Bubonic plague cases occur in the South West: The Navajo reservation gets a few cases each year, so we IHS docs know about it. It is spread by fleabites and is treatable with antibiotics. The Pulmonary form however is quickly fatal: but only would spread in close contact with a patient who developed pneumonia. Isolation and masks help.
Weils disease is something we see in the Philippines after typhoons and floods, where people are in contact with water that has rat feces. A nasty disease, but again one that can be treated with antibiotics if diagnosed quickly.
These labs were about investigating local diseases that could cause epidemics: you analyze the strain of the germ, if it is new or a well known variant. You then can figure out the treatment or make a vaccine to stop it.
Some of this research is risky: especially the reseach where they deliberately change the pathogen to see how it acts in humans, which is what was being done in the USA, until there were a few accidents in US labs so it was banned. But after Obama stopped the risky research in the USA it was funded in China, even though their labs didn't have a good safety record (heck, in 2004 they even accidentally released SARS from one lab).
The dirty little secret is that to be a weapon, a disease must be able to be contained or limited. That means no person to person spread, because once it spreads person to person it can kill everyone, even your own people aka blowback.A biological military threat could be biowarfare but it could also be because of insects, flooding, bad water, or a deliberate release of a pathogen.
There are diseases that have military implications, where you can see outbreaks as part of war. Trench fever (and typhus, both spread by lice) and influenza killed more soldiers than weapons in World War I, but those who did not die often were unable to return to combat quickly. And the malaria caused illness and deaths in the South Pacific region were a real danger to readiness.
and I won't even get into ordinary diseases like Diarrhea. The UN Peacekeepers from Nepal build their latrines in the wrong area, and the result was a cholera epidemic that killed thousands.
Download and read the book on biological threats in wartime LINK
more here
No comments:
Post a Comment