no, not the naive activists lamenting in the headlines that they can't push their agenda without the bluenosed bigots objecting: but the real predators who are ready, willing, and able to exploit the children whose natural defenses against being sexually touched or used have been weakened by such teaching.
but by exposing immature children to distorted sexual ideas instead of teaching traditional ideas like self control, it makes them quite vulnerable to being exploited, not necessarily by the teachers, who often are innocent about such things, but by other predators who can spot vulnerable kids and abuse them.
Back when I was in medical school (late 1960s) the Freudian theory was that kids needed to be exposed to sexual knowledge at an early age so they wouldn't have hangups: And some of our psychiatric treachers even said it would be a good idea if they were introduced to sex by an older, sympathetic adult.
Later, when a TV film about incest was shown and talked about, I read in Newsweek that if docs and social workers found such incest, we should not report it because it would "break up" the family...
These ideas are getting pushed again now, but luckily for the public, there are a few honest reporters who note that there are indeed bad people out there...
I am talking about Netflix/BBC drama on Jimmy Saville:
Ultimately though, Jimmy Saville: A British Horror Story is not an easy watch. This is a documentary that’s going to leave a sour taste in the mouth and some of the victim stories are absolutely heart-breaking to listen to. There’s no fixing them and the disgusting red-ribboned medallions, claiming that Jim has done just that, feels now like a stomach churning joke at our expense. I’m not a religious man but if there is an afterlife, let’s hope Saville is rotting in the deepest recesses of Hell for his actions.
Sigh
So my main objection is that a teacher has no more right to proclaim his sexuality to students any more than he has the right to proclaim his belief in Jesus Christ as his personal savior.
Instead of speaking with upset parents, journalists chose to dismiss them again and again—and even worse, they chose to tell them that what they are seeing it isn't really there. The mainstream media apparatus prefers gaslighting instead of investigating, especially when it involves the concerns of working-class people, speaking as if we are too dumb to understand concepts, speaking for us instead of with us and then gaslighting us when step out of line.
No comments:
Post a Comment