The former head of the UK's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, told Boris Johnson in early 2020 that the Covid virus escaped from the Wuhan lab. That means that the US, UK, Chinese, & German governments all knew the truth, covered it up, and spread disinformation. Case closed. https://t.co/XVngt0mOdD pic.twitter.com/kk4WOEVDnT
— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) March 16, 2025
......
......
how shocking is this revealation? Even the NYTimes admits that maybe it was leaked
A miracle has happened. The NY Times ran an oped acknowledging not only that the covid virus likely originated in a lab, but that government officials and scientists conspired to keep the substantiating evidence secret. The lab leak theory was censored on social media because… pic.twitter.com/QjXVtF46nF
— Jenin Younes (@JeninYounesEsq) March 16, 2025
....
Joe Rogan listeners found this out three years ago:
so Grok, has Lancet and other journals figured this out?
https://x.com/i/grok/share/QHh7fxfS9NEmro5Hyw5sgtL6b
The Lancet has not published definitive "lab leak evidence" regarding the origins of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Instead, the journal has been involved in the ongoing debate through letters and statements from scientists, none of which provide conclusive evidence for the lab leak hypothesis. Here’s a breakdown of key publications related to this topic in The Lancet: February 19, 2020: The Lancet published a statement titled "Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19." Signed by 27 scientists, it condemned conspiracy theories suggesting COVID-19 did not have a natural origin, asserting that the virus likely originated in wildlife. This letter, organized by Peter Daszak, aimed to dismiss the lab leak idea early in the pandemic and has since been criticized due to Daszak’s ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. July 5, 2021: A follow-up letter titled "Science, not speculation, is essential to determine how SARS-CoV-2 reached humans" was published. Authored by many of the same scientists from the 2020 letter, it reiterated their stance that the strongest evidence pointed to a natural origin, while acknowledging that lab leak suggestions lacked scientifically validated evidence in peer-reviewed journals at that time. This was not evidence for a lab leak but a defense of their earlier position. September 17, 2021: The Lancet published "An appeal for an objective, open, and transparent scientific debate about the origin of SARS-CoV-2," written by a different group of 16 scientists. This letter argued that a laboratory-related accident was plausible and criticized the dismissal of the lab leak hypothesis, noting the lack of direct evidence for a natural origin as well. It called for further investigation but did not present new evidence. The Lancet itself has not published primary research or definitive evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis related to Wuhan. Its role has been to host debates via correspondence, with the above dates marking significant moments. The lab leak discussion has evolved outside The Lancet, with other journals like Science and investigative reports contributing more direct analyses, but no single publication in The Lancet provides "lab leak evidence" as of March 18, 2025.
----------------
so why worry? Because batflu lady is still at it.
🤔A new bat coronavirus that has the capacity to spread to humans, similar to the one that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, has been discovered.
— Camus (@newstart_2024) February 21, 2025
HKU5-CoV-2 was found by a Chinese research team led by virologist Shi Zhengli, known as "Batwoman" for her work on coronaviruses,… pic.twitter.com/tcxCNYypjc
...
Update: British intelligence knew this too and covered it up.
as Men in Black remind you:
No comments:
Post a Comment