The transgender madness had infiltrated society in a way that resembled group hysteria behind the witch hunts or the group hysteria behind the Tulip Mania.
What made it worse for those of us living in the Third world was how the US/EU/UK and big business were pushing it on us. Pope Francis called this cultural imperialism, and I agree.
This of course is not the only hysteria in recent years: Dr Campbell who vlogs on public health and Covid deceptions has this explanation of the phenomenum:
But the trans hatred silenced anyone who opposed it, and the pressure to stay quiet despite experience in the past resulted in the silencing of anyone pointing out that this grooming of depressed often gay kids into becoming trans was an artificial phenomenum with no scientific basis...
and to make things worse, parents were often pressured to agree by threatening them to be the cause of their child's suicide if they refused to allow the treatments.
these aggressive attacks on the heretics who refused to go along with the trans hysteria was not limited to mean tweets, but morphed into people losing jobs and death threats to those who dared to point out this was a fad that harmed people, especially girls.
with the shootings of Christian schools/churches by trans (or in Kirk's case, a friend of a trans) who seemed to be encouraged to act on their anger by some on the internet, the mania has morphed from mean tweets, being fired or losing friends, into murder.
And the huge number of normal people who gleefully celebrated the death of Charlie Kirk shows a more disturbing problem, one backed by polls, showing that a large minority would approve of similar murders of those refusing to bow to the fad.
In Kirk's case, what is worse is the lies by activists that misquoted him and pushed a fake narrative about what he said to justify his murder.
The quiet outpouring or prayer, not riots, following his death may or may not have popped open the delusional bubble, but one hopes it might be a turning point.
Which brings up to JK Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series.
Mark Twain once wrote: “If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and man.”
JK Rowling dared to take a stand against transgender craze based on her personal experience of being poor and not part of the establishment....her protest against the trans agenda was not against individuals who just wanted to live and let live, but on those pushing the agenda on others in a way that harmed women: by forcing women to be unable to have privacy or forcing them to compete against a trans whose muscles and bone structure give them an unfair advantage against women. And this doesn't even include the perverts in who claim being transgender to be peeping Toms or who get arousal by exposing themselves to young girls.,.
The vitriol against Rowling was terrible, but what was worse was the threats of violence against her and her family. She made a lot of people rich with her writings, including the actors in her films. Yet when the social shaming of Rowling started, even when the death threats were very real, none of them bothered to even tweet support for her or protest against those who threatened her.
It came to the head when several of those who literally became rich and famous due to Rowlings gleefully joined those trying to destroy her reputation, income, and even her life.
But now that the tide is starting to turn against this group hysteria, one of them figured a short private note would wash away literally years of this betrayal.
Rowlings did not become a best selling author by being quiet, so the entire story is here on X;
I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) September 29, 2025
I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should… https://t.co/c0pz19P7jc
...
a short excerpt
Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself.
Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number).
This was back when the death, rape and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety...
Rowlings then goes on to point out something that is taboo to mention in the UK: class prejudice. The dirty little secret behind the silence against the rape gangs there is the abused girls were mainly working class whites. So the government officials, even the Labour party which was founded to support the working class, did not intervene.
And Rowlings throws this fact into the hypocrite's face:
Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. '
She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-run rape crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a male rapist who's identified into the women's prison?
....I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges...
No comments:
Post a Comment