,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
his website has been following the documents for awhile. Here is an example: March 20,2024: even before the details of the treaty was released, the usual suspects approved of it.
Over 100 members of the Club of Madrid, the Global Leadership Foundation and the Nizami Ganjavi International Center (NGIC), and other prominent people from around the world have published a joint letter to the leaders of the member states of the WHO, calling for an urgent agreement on a pandemic accord.
A pandemic accord would deliver vast and universally shared benefits, including greater capacity to detect new and dangerous pathogens, access to information about pathogens detected elsewhere in the world…
sounds good. No problem, right?
The devil is in the details:
As countries now enter what should be the final stages of the negotiations, they must ensure that they are agreeing on actions which will do the job required: to prevent and mitigate pandemic threats.
italics mine.
it implies that all countries will have to go along with the decisions on what to do, but the big question is: who decides what actions need to be done.
We urge solutions which ensure both speed in reporting and sharing pathogens, and in access – in every country – to sufficient tools like tests and vaccines to protect lives and minimise harm.
good.
The public and private sectors must work together towards the public good.
so far so good. Makes sense.
Uh oh:
This global effort is being threatened by misinformation and disinformation.
translation: censorship of those who say wait a second.
Among the falsehoods circulating are allegations that the WHO intends to monitor people’s movements through digital passports; that it will take away the national sovereignty of countries; and that it will have the ability to deploy armed troops to enforce mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns. All of these claims are wholly false and governments must work to disavow them with clear facts
uh, maybe the reason some folks think they will do these things is that they did this for covid.
And a lot of people now think that it was overkill, causing economic damage, diverting resources from preventing other diseases, (dengue because no money to spray for mosquitos, rabies deaths because people threw out their dogs because they couldn't afford to feed them) and folks not getting routine care so they die of ordinary preventable diseases, (Cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes).
and it was the WHO and other experts who essentially instructed the Philippines what to do.
in summary: the overblown shut down of the world economy to stop the covid virus is now being seen as less wise than a short shutdown and routine isolation of cases.
And the censorship of opinions and possible treatments has resulted in pushback against these WHO experts.
Like the boy who cried wolf, the problem is that if a real pandemic happened, people will just ignore what they are told by these experts.
Once trust is lost, it will take awhile until it is reformed.
We saw this in the Philippines after the Dengue vaccine experiment that killed some kids: a lot of parents refused routine shots that have been around for fifty years, so we had more kids die of measles etc. because the parents no longer trusted the public health authorities.
sigh.
----------------
an example of disinformation: No, those sudden deaths were not caused by the vaccine says the CDC.
One state, Oregon, and reports of 40 cases, and all cases were early in the epidemic. June 2021 to Dec 2022... But a lot of the reports in the press were after second or third boosters.
the Epoch times notes the problems with this study: cross posted here on FreeRepublic (NSFW). because of firewall.
No comments:
Post a Comment